Stable Arrays of Charged Particles

We have reasoned that when global electric traction upon charged particles exceeds that for ionic recombination force within a charged body, the charged particles are subject to stable redeployment into polarized arrays. This concept has solved some unanswered questions and debunked some very peculiar answers presently embedded in scientific doctrine. It explains polar jets in a way that makes sense; lightning formation and distribution, the illusion of cosmic acceleration, solar corona temperatures, galactic central bulges, snowflake development, and the neutrino deficit. Being saddled with such discovery brings one into intensive compulsion to disclose his treasured findings before he hits the finish line.

Early on, it had been surprising to find no easy access for disclosure of such findings. Basic electronics expertise led to such a simple concept that nevertheless remained ignored until recent ventures into scientific forums. The watchword in such venues is to avoid Stigma. Unless one has something new, why would one want to report it? But if it is something new, then it is subject to being disqualified as something Off Mainstream. Forum moderators rush out shooting from the hip with anything but encouragement. A moderator’s negativity diminishes ones credibility before a mass of casual observers, but the exposure can advance a nobody from Ignored to Ridiculed on Mahatma Gandhi’s four-step ranking of progress. That leaves only two more steps to go. Even impaired exposure can bring on a perceptive thinker who might yet further the concept. Maybe some day even physicists will be playing with a full deck as a result.

Our ability to determine the polarity of Earth by treating it as a Faraday cage is our premise for identifying the polarity of the sun (Both are negative.) The term Faraday cage lends Earth the description of being coated with its majority charge, which is the polarity of transient charged particles, electrons, continuously being restored to the ionosphere as the Fair Weather Current. Earth is hence an environment in which positive charges migrate or propagate toward her center, and precious little can ever bring them back up unless Earth somehow sheds its negative charge.

We can drop the Faraday cage identity or analogy whatever at any time. Too many people are in charge of Faraday cages and too few understand them. We need know only that like charges repel and vice versa. Fruitless disagreements have emerged because the earth is not made of metal, it is not impervious to radiation, and other pointless quibble right or wrong, then no fair because it does have ions inside, and why can we get hit by lightning when we are inside (we are not quite).

Given: The majority charge of Earth is on her outside, and our meteorologists report seeing electrons sneaking out there all the time as negative FWC; so Earth is negative. The ionosphere is pushed down by noonday sun, showing the sun to be negative too. So then, both bodies have positive cores (This calls for respectful attention if you are counting neutrinos.) A forum moderator says he never heard of such a thing. I said that I said it because it seemed to be too unsaid. Why else would I ever say it?