Upon comparing our model of Milkyway to the Hoag Object, a sloppy oversight of ours showed up: when a galaxy evens up its count of charged particles and shifts to a positive charge, that is moment that defangs its so called accretion disk. That great wheel of protons is then no longer repelled toward the galactic center by attraction of the galaxy's negative rim. The respective equality of both sets of charged particles brings on their mixing that presents refurbished hydrogen in classic atomic material format.
Surviving stars can flourish then, and the makings of new stars would present an imitation of the Hoag Object. Negative galactic charge would resume and the galactic bulge would be gone. Transverse motion of descending protons would survive the quadrature force of electrical galactic traction to thus orbit the central black hole. Again a disk of protons would stake out an inner domain of dark matter, but by that time we might have a better name for that matter.
Curious as to how scientists oblivious to electroconcentric repolarization could fancy an explanation for galactic bulges, we encountered an even greater mystery. Astrophysicists had pointed us to the explanation that the bulge was composed of stars in random orbit. The ironic glowing of that extreme dark matter suggested stellar fusion to them and thus mainstream science accepted the idea of sustained random orbiting as an alternative to consideration of electrical properties to the universe! It seems that when the true description is unattainable, such a vacuous speculation is left standing because no contrary description supports its rebuttal. We have supplied alternative description to that of a ball of stars sharing a common center with diverse rotational axes.
