Since it isn't easy to keep astrophysics right down to Earth, the layman needn't hang his hat on all of its lore. Taking a little latitude right now, your informant proposes that black holes don't spin as much as some folks might suppose.
As far as magnetism goes, it should suffice that a slowly rotating accretion disk would do that job just fine. It makes up for low rotation by its generous radius of who knows how many light years, cranking googol after googol of protons around a galaxy's axis.
Suspicions arose upon contemplation of the inner dimensions to the disk of protons involved. All loose protons located below the rim would represent commensurate endothermic displacement for the distance involved, all the way down to the event horizon. The electrical charging in terms of such displacement would seem to have been derived from energy of the original orbital velocity of the particles. At one extreme, all such kinetic energy would have been extracted once a charged particle halts above the event horizon amidst the deadlocked tug of war between the black hole and the rim of its accretion disk. A momentary neutralization from an electron tips the scale, affording acceleration into the singularity, reacquiring a kinetic form of energy untainted by tangential momentum. Short of such an extreme, all protons, to the extent that they are depressed from the rim of the accretion disk, manifest electrical storage of energy taken from kinetic energy of orbital revolution.
Calling the initial premise of these blogs "electroconcentric macropolarization", "Myrtle Effect", or whatever; the forsaken electrical effects on cosmic architecture should work wonders for any dedicated scholars humble and generous enough to heed these clumsy explanations.
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Friday, March 27, 2009
GALACTIC HEIR TO UNSPENT HYDROGEN
Hydrogen is still the cosmic default flavor of the day because its atoms so outnumber everything else. A consequential phenomenon as hydrogen orbits a black hole is that obstructs the orbits of the denser particles of other, neutron bearing atoms that travel at speeds above that default velocity.
The profoundly positive charge of central accretion disks brings us to an extreme. As it expands to encroach upon a stellar system, it dispatches negative surface charge in a jiffy and dismantles molecular structure by the same means. The nuclear remains become lofted above the point of capture due to additional lift by galactic traction, but neutron bearing particles to a lesser degree, and those pieces feel the proton drag. Outer protons attain their elevation above the black hole from tangential velocity native to the captured matter augmented by newfound electrostatic repulsion. Imediately below such strata would be protons traveling at a reduced increment of velocity and endowed with endothermic displacement from the outer rim. A proton at that level would have momentarily lost galactic repulsion by neutralizing effect from passing proximity of an electron being snatched from yet higher up as the disk relentlessly expands. Such a step-down represents sacrifice of some tangential velocity in exchange for endothermic displacement (virtual electrical charge) manifested by its reduced altitude. And so it goes along the radius to the galactic rotational axis. But such smearing would be irrevalent jitter, with electrical charge responding with its own exothermic bounce to liberate the proton back to the higher strata. The catch is in the geometry of convergence of electron patterns imploding toward the rotational axis. A dynamic smearing effect on proton locations procedes with increased electrical tension toward the center being offset by increased incidence of electron interference at such positions.
The gradient of energy distribution thus runs from maximum tangential velocity at outer limits with minimal virtual electrical charge there; to maximum virtual electrical charge at the center with minimal velocity as a proton approaches the event horizon. This might tell us that black holes do not get as dizzy as one might expect.
At some time far beyond our future, that distant accretion disk amidst the Milky Way will have gobbled its way out to our sun or whatever remains of it. It will trash it; sending most of our electrons to real outer space, keeping nearly all of the ionic hydrogen, and stuffing everything else into our supermassive black hole, even the internet. The good news is that when the Milky Way goes dark, it will no longer be under acceleration.
The profoundly positive charge of central accretion disks brings us to an extreme. As it expands to encroach upon a stellar system, it dispatches negative surface charge in a jiffy and dismantles molecular structure by the same means. The nuclear remains become lofted above the point of capture due to additional lift by galactic traction, but neutron bearing particles to a lesser degree, and those pieces feel the proton drag. Outer protons attain their elevation above the black hole from tangential velocity native to the captured matter augmented by newfound electrostatic repulsion. Imediately below such strata would be protons traveling at a reduced increment of velocity and endowed with endothermic displacement from the outer rim. A proton at that level would have momentarily lost galactic repulsion by neutralizing effect from passing proximity of an electron being snatched from yet higher up as the disk relentlessly expands. Such a step-down represents sacrifice of some tangential velocity in exchange for endothermic displacement (virtual electrical charge) manifested by its reduced altitude. And so it goes along the radius to the galactic rotational axis. But such smearing would be irrevalent jitter, with electrical charge responding with its own exothermic bounce to liberate the proton back to the higher strata. The catch is in the geometry of convergence of electron patterns imploding toward the rotational axis. A dynamic smearing effect on proton locations procedes with increased electrical tension toward the center being offset by increased incidence of electron interference at such positions.
The gradient of energy distribution thus runs from maximum tangential velocity at outer limits with minimal virtual electrical charge there; to maximum virtual electrical charge at the center with minimal velocity as a proton approaches the event horizon. This might tell us that black holes do not get as dizzy as one might expect.
At some time far beyond our future, that distant accretion disk amidst the Milky Way will have gobbled its way out to our sun or whatever remains of it. It will trash it; sending most of our electrons to real outer space, keeping nearly all of the ionic hydrogen, and stuffing everything else into our supermassive black hole, even the internet. The good news is that when the Milky Way goes dark, it will no longer be under acceleration.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
WHY THERE IS LIGHTNING
It is unknown here that findings disclosed in any of these posts can be found anywhere else. That is why they are being presented here. Therefore, any students obliged to please a teacher should treat this information as contraband heresy.
Several characteristics of water brings that substance to the forefront in the natural making of lightning. These charactristics combine with a significant ambient ion density to enable water to host exchanges of atmospheric energy. Water is plentiful, it possesses the highest specific heat of any common substance in our environment, it enters and departs from the atmospheric mixture under common fluctuation of conditions that influence its changes of state, and it involves a significant amount of latent energy.
This is easy when you know that the atmosphere is loaded with negative ions. The default explainers of our world are still bogged down with scratching up electrons or ions as though they represent energy. They are just matter and they come with the house so to speak. Water vapor freshly rejoining the atmosphere undergoes a process of adaptation under appropriate circumstances before it acquires the normal atmospheric ionic density. Electrons rising due to Fair Weather Current tend to nullify the virtual positive electrical charge imposed by fresh vapor, but such emission varies widely according to surface elevation, texture and temperature, etc. Thus, meager electron emissions of a pico amp or so per square meter occur from ocean surfaces, even at high tide, and an unsuspected bounty of electrons flows from high or pointy surfaces. (That would seem to explain the meager lightning at sea compared to that occurring inland.)
Saddled with a vast population of negative ions, our atmosphere spaces them out for stratified equidistant ionic juxtaposition around the globe. Electrical energy is stored within this medium by encroaching upon such equidistance, whereby ions subjected to further crowding would represent a virtual negative charge, and ions afforded additional spacing would represent a virtual positive charge.
We hereby review a scenario demonstrating natural development of high negative voltages. Some 540 Calories of heat energy are invested in the change of state for each liter of water evaporating into the atmosphere. Upon normalization of ionic density for such vapor, much of that latent energy is subject to conversion into storage as electrical energy upon condensation of the vapor as in the formation of rain. This is because the condensation process brings the water molecules and ions closer to each other. Mutual repulsion of the ions resisting increased proximity demands absorption of latent energy for the endothermic process of crowding negative ions together. Thus, heat energy introduced from sunshine becomes electrical energy stored upon surfaces of forming raindrops. (The little things perform as Faraday Cages: ions being confined to outer surface, excluded from inner content.) As raindrops grow, whether by merging with each other or by additional condensation upon existing droplets, the ionic density has doubled when the volume has increased by a factor of eight. (That is because total ion count follows the volume factor, and it would be distributed upon a surface increase of only four.)
Condensation and freezing of water occur under cooling conditions whereby chilled vapor molecules fall below escape velocity from each other and liquid molecules fall below mutual orbital velocity. There is an interesting side effect upon raindrops with increasing electric charges. Electrostatic repulsion of the negative ions diminishes the effects of intermolecular gravity so that vapor molecules remain at escape velocities at the usual dew point and they maintain orbital speeds at the usual freezing point. This confronts our meteorologists with issues concerning supersaturation and supercooled liquid water. Remember, that these ions restrict themselves to the skin of the raindrops until they let go. When a rainstorm has charged up tantamount to producing thunderbolts, a raindrop's outer layer can remain liquid down to temperatures around minus forty degrees Celsius, although ice would have been forming inside as soon as droplet temperatures fall below zero degrees (Updrafts incidental to such storms account for such routine chilling.) Cause and effect gets turned around a lot when experts take up on these matters.
Several characteristics of water brings that substance to the forefront in the natural making of lightning. These charactristics combine with a significant ambient ion density to enable water to host exchanges of atmospheric energy. Water is plentiful, it possesses the highest specific heat of any common substance in our environment, it enters and departs from the atmospheric mixture under common fluctuation of conditions that influence its changes of state, and it involves a significant amount of latent energy.
This is easy when you know that the atmosphere is loaded with negative ions. The default explainers of our world are still bogged down with scratching up electrons or ions as though they represent energy. They are just matter and they come with the house so to speak. Water vapor freshly rejoining the atmosphere undergoes a process of adaptation under appropriate circumstances before it acquires the normal atmospheric ionic density. Electrons rising due to Fair Weather Current tend to nullify the virtual positive electrical charge imposed by fresh vapor, but such emission varies widely according to surface elevation, texture and temperature, etc. Thus, meager electron emissions of a pico amp or so per square meter occur from ocean surfaces, even at high tide, and an unsuspected bounty of electrons flows from high or pointy surfaces. (That would seem to explain the meager lightning at sea compared to that occurring inland.)
Saddled with a vast population of negative ions, our atmosphere spaces them out for stratified equidistant ionic juxtaposition around the globe. Electrical energy is stored within this medium by encroaching upon such equidistance, whereby ions subjected to further crowding would represent a virtual negative charge, and ions afforded additional spacing would represent a virtual positive charge.
We hereby review a scenario demonstrating natural development of high negative voltages. Some 540 Calories of heat energy are invested in the change of state for each liter of water evaporating into the atmosphere. Upon normalization of ionic density for such vapor, much of that latent energy is subject to conversion into storage as electrical energy upon condensation of the vapor as in the formation of rain. This is because the condensation process brings the water molecules and ions closer to each other. Mutual repulsion of the ions resisting increased proximity demands absorption of latent energy for the endothermic process of crowding negative ions together. Thus, heat energy introduced from sunshine becomes electrical energy stored upon surfaces of forming raindrops. (The little things perform as Faraday Cages: ions being confined to outer surface, excluded from inner content.) As raindrops grow, whether by merging with each other or by additional condensation upon existing droplets, the ionic density has doubled when the volume has increased by a factor of eight. (That is because total ion count follows the volume factor, and it would be distributed upon a surface increase of only four.)
Condensation and freezing of water occur under cooling conditions whereby chilled vapor molecules fall below escape velocity from each other and liquid molecules fall below mutual orbital velocity. There is an interesting side effect upon raindrops with increasing electric charges. Electrostatic repulsion of the negative ions diminishes the effects of intermolecular gravity so that vapor molecules remain at escape velocities at the usual dew point and they maintain orbital speeds at the usual freezing point. This confronts our meteorologists with issues concerning supersaturation and supercooled liquid water. Remember, that these ions restrict themselves to the skin of the raindrops until they let go. When a rainstorm has charged up tantamount to producing thunderbolts, a raindrop's outer layer can remain liquid down to temperatures around minus forty degrees Celsius, although ice would have been forming inside as soon as droplet temperatures fall below zero degrees (Updrafts incidental to such storms account for such routine chilling.) Cause and effect gets turned around a lot when experts take up on these matters.
Sunday, March 15, 2009
SWEATING THE SMALL STUFF
Hear tell that the LHC may start up in June of 2009. Explanations of our safety from consequential mini black holes are far over the laymans' heads. We wee folk must just cross our fingers and not to worry about the slack we find twixt truth and tales from the annointed.
Heeding repolarization, we can know they don't know of Earth's positive core that would early-on delay any conspicuous implosion of both hemispheres in the name of science.
A train of mini black holes filing down to Earth's center one second apart, gobbling up matter all the way down, would leave us saying "so far so good" right up to their assimilation of the last lonesome protons. Only until then would a conglomerate little black hole decline further feeding by repelling its would-be repast. Old Fort Knox would meet the Taj Mahal and China's Great Wall.
Don't really know, but am taking my last chance to say so.
Heeding repolarization, we can know they don't know of Earth's positive core that would early-on delay any conspicuous implosion of both hemispheres in the name of science.
A train of mini black holes filing down to Earth's center one second apart, gobbling up matter all the way down, would leave us saying "so far so good" right up to their assimilation of the last lonesome protons. Only until then would a conglomerate little black hole decline further feeding by repelling its would-be repast. Old Fort Knox would meet the Taj Mahal and China's Great Wall.
Don't really know, but am taking my last chance to say so.
DOUBTS FOR COSMIC ACCELERATION
Dark matter has been proclaimed as cause for so many black dots in our night sky. Here, we believe that a lot of darkness is caused by reverse polarity on celestial bodies that causes nuclear fuel to be spread out on the surface instead of being lumped up in the middle and squeezed. When a star has been freshly captured by a galactic accretion disk, it has become positively charged in a big way but it will still glow until it cools down, and will soon enough deserve the title "Dark Matter". The important point is that the term is used broadly and should not make anyone angry.
Please note that cosmic acceleration has been declared by scientists who can be considering nothing but very visible matter that must indeed bear negative charge, just like the universe. That is what repolarization is all about! Matter bearing the majority cosmic charge (negative) receives cosmic traction toward the cosmic outskirts 24/7. It follows that matter bearing the cosmic minority charge (positive) receives cosmic traction toward the site of Big Bang. Its a wash! Objects of either polarity are simply in the process of exchanging places with each other.
Hence, just maybe we can put our trust back into gravity. Nature is tricky and has shown us but half of the story.
Please note that cosmic acceleration has been declared by scientists who can be considering nothing but very visible matter that must indeed bear negative charge, just like the universe. That is what repolarization is all about! Matter bearing the majority cosmic charge (negative) receives cosmic traction toward the cosmic outskirts 24/7. It follows that matter bearing the cosmic minority charge (positive) receives cosmic traction toward the site of Big Bang. Its a wash! Objects of either polarity are simply in the process of exchanging places with each other.
Hence, just maybe we can put our trust back into gravity. Nature is tricky and has shown us but half of the story.
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
GRAND SCALE REPOLARIZATIONS
Version 1: modified 3/28/09
STARS
The negative charge revealed for the sun simply by common knowledge of Fair Weather Current here on Earth brings us to logical determination that the core of any functioning star is a balled-up cluster of nuclear material. We know that most of that core is of solitary protons and that it is devoid of electrons. Electrons missing from such remnants of hydrogen would be accounted for as being spread out atop the star amongst the stellar surplus that gives the orb its negative charge. Such electrons lurk within negative ions in upper stellar atmosphere or hover above the incandescent gasses as a great negative bubble suspended electrostatically by net global repulsion against the pulls of gravity and the attractive charge of the central core. We could term that bubble as an electrosphere (comparable to Earth's) if that nomenclature has not been grandfathered for something else.
Everything stacks up and many longstanding mysteries are dispelled if we assume that when matter transfers into energy, particles of positive charge have been reduced in number. No electrons even bear witness to such atrocities where and when they happen within stellar cores. The squeezing that brings protons together is strongest right where global electrostatic traction has delivered the ready fuel. As fusion occurs, consequential reduction in particles of positive charge at the core of the star releases comparable numbers of electrons from stellar grasp to produce a predominately negative stellar wind. Introduction and release of electrons from the electrosphere would keep its contents busy satisfying their necessary equidistance from each other, to the extent that the resulting jiggle of electric current might sufficiently heat that electrosphere to account for those high temperature stellar coronas mysteriously exceeding ambient gas temperatures of the stellar surface. Another Holy Grail for the first soul to say so.
GALAXIES
Since it is always daytime everywhere around a star, a lot of electrons overflow from each one of them, supplying bright galaxies with substantial negative charges at their rims. As a result, assuming plentiful occasions for ionization; protons and other particles bearing positive charge must always be converging inwardly in all bright galaxies.
Now, in our Milky Way, coveting the greater prize on the other side, protons scorn the closest arc of its rim to covet greater share of the attractive galactic rim beyond, until at half way across, equalization of both fore and aft attraction terminates further migration. Long ago, when the galaxy was but a ball of gas, the sole proton to ever reach the center led runner-ups that joined as a hollow sphere of protons surrounding that point while remaining asunder. That sphere grew to define a region of dark matter below, flattened out with the galaxy, and serves now as greedy maw for the black hole it has cultivated at its center. It is undertaking a coup de grace that will, far in the future, turn Milky Way into another black dot in the night sky of other worlds. That is the accretion disk to our super massive black hole. It maintains slow but perpetual growth from steady migration of positive particles out of a field of some 50 thousand light years' radius and occasions of monstrous growth as it encroaches upon stellar systems, always jetting most electrons into the void, pocketing all of the single protons, and dumping everything else into the black hole. No, Virginia, the black hole doesn't come first.
A menace to simplicity arises in contemplation of a variable skew between gravitational and electrostatic centers of a galaxy. Our super massive black hole holds an existing wheel of protons in orbit, but conceivably independent wanderings of the galactic electrostatic and gravitational centers takes the matter out of our hands. By and large we can still get the feel of it all without getting too far off base.
Our accretion disk serves as a proton motel where none check out. It engulfs a star to drag electrons down for disposal via polar jet, swelling itself to encircle a greater share of the galaxy until the last act when it will be dismissing electrons from the galaxy faster than remaining stars can replace them with their overflow. Soon after that it will nullify the negative galactic charge and terminate fusion for the remaining stars.
STARS
The negative charge revealed for the sun simply by common knowledge of Fair Weather Current here on Earth brings us to logical determination that the core of any functioning star is a balled-up cluster of nuclear material. We know that most of that core is of solitary protons and that it is devoid of electrons. Electrons missing from such remnants of hydrogen would be accounted for as being spread out atop the star amongst the stellar surplus that gives the orb its negative charge. Such electrons lurk within negative ions in upper stellar atmosphere or hover above the incandescent gasses as a great negative bubble suspended electrostatically by net global repulsion against the pulls of gravity and the attractive charge of the central core. We could term that bubble as an electrosphere (comparable to Earth's) if that nomenclature has not been grandfathered for something else.
Everything stacks up and many longstanding mysteries are dispelled if we assume that when matter transfers into energy, particles of positive charge have been reduced in number. No electrons even bear witness to such atrocities where and when they happen within stellar cores. The squeezing that brings protons together is strongest right where global electrostatic traction has delivered the ready fuel. As fusion occurs, consequential reduction in particles of positive charge at the core of the star releases comparable numbers of electrons from stellar grasp to produce a predominately negative stellar wind. Introduction and release of electrons from the electrosphere would keep its contents busy satisfying their necessary equidistance from each other, to the extent that the resulting jiggle of electric current might sufficiently heat that electrosphere to account for those high temperature stellar coronas mysteriously exceeding ambient gas temperatures of the stellar surface. Another Holy Grail for the first soul to say so.
GALAXIES
Since it is always daytime everywhere around a star, a lot of electrons overflow from each one of them, supplying bright galaxies with substantial negative charges at their rims. As a result, assuming plentiful occasions for ionization; protons and other particles bearing positive charge must always be converging inwardly in all bright galaxies.
Now, in our Milky Way, coveting the greater prize on the other side, protons scorn the closest arc of its rim to covet greater share of the attractive galactic rim beyond, until at half way across, equalization of both fore and aft attraction terminates further migration. Long ago, when the galaxy was but a ball of gas, the sole proton to ever reach the center led runner-ups that joined as a hollow sphere of protons surrounding that point while remaining asunder. That sphere grew to define a region of dark matter below, flattened out with the galaxy, and serves now as greedy maw for the black hole it has cultivated at its center. It is undertaking a coup de grace that will, far in the future, turn Milky Way into another black dot in the night sky of other worlds. That is the accretion disk to our super massive black hole. It maintains slow but perpetual growth from steady migration of positive particles out of a field of some 50 thousand light years' radius and occasions of monstrous growth as it encroaches upon stellar systems, always jetting most electrons into the void, pocketing all of the single protons, and dumping everything else into the black hole. No, Virginia, the black hole doesn't come first.
A menace to simplicity arises in contemplation of a variable skew between gravitational and electrostatic centers of a galaxy. Our super massive black hole holds an existing wheel of protons in orbit, but conceivably independent wanderings of the galactic electrostatic and gravitational centers takes the matter out of our hands. By and large we can still get the feel of it all without getting too far off base.
Our accretion disk serves as a proton motel where none check out. It engulfs a star to drag electrons down for disposal via polar jet, swelling itself to encircle a greater share of the galaxy until the last act when it will be dismissing electrons from the galaxy faster than remaining stars can replace them with their overflow. Soon after that it will nullify the negative galactic charge and terminate fusion for the remaining stars.
Sunday, March 8, 2009
BLACK HOLES AND POLAR JETS
Version 1: Modified 3/28/09
Version 2 Modified 6/6/09
We have alluded to the positive core of stellar bodies, and will get back to that in a later post. Letting it suffice to describe stellar fusion as an issue of positron depletion, we borrow credence that shining galaxies bear an excess of electrons. Hence, systemic traction for charged particles in shining stars and in outer portions of shining galaxies is outward for electrons and inward for particles of positive charge. There is no escape for such positive particles from an active galaxy. They descend to an ever-increasing accretion disk which has become an orbiting body of protons whirling around a super massive black hole that was nothing more than the center of gravity for the disk in the first place, or of the sphere that the disk had been at the time.
Beneath the rim of this accretion disk lies a domain of dark matter by virtue of regional positive majority charge: systemic traction strives to elevate particles of positive charge and to drive electrons down to the rotational axis. At any elevation within the disk, a proton holds its radial position in part from centrifugal force and in part from electrostatic repulsion. Protons at the rim of the disk are at electrostatic rest, held aloft from the black hole by its transverse velocity ergo centrifugal force. Protons gain displacement down from the rim as kinetic energy converts to virtual electrical charge under the influence of descending electrons sweeping across the orbital proton paths. Positive ionic density tapers down with descent due to increased electron density brought on by convergence.
As the accretion disk continues to grow, its rim intervenes upon any neutral matter such as to be found in stellar systems or dust in orbit around the singularity, to rip away electrons with its severe electrostatic traction. It thus showers the protons below with momentary neutralizations as perhaps they take an occasional encirclement. During such neutralization of a proton at any given level, it has lost its electrostatic share of lift, to fall a tiny way before re-ionization. Thereby, kinetic energy has given way to increased storage of electrical energy as the proton finds itself driven farther from its quest of the rim. Each such incident steps the proton to lower radial position on the disk and to a reduced velocity. Given the influence of a sufficient unrelenting wash of descending electrons, a proton could be driven as far down as the event horizon, or anywhere between. The overall result is a smearing of proton wind that confounds orbital suspension for heavier particles to be conveyed into the event horizon. When "feeding time" is over, the charged portion should thin down and stretch out as though a casted noose extending out in pursuit of more distant star systems. After roping another victim, a new supply of descending electrons spreads the disk out to filter more food into the black hole, and the galaxy gets reamed out some more.
No such rigmarole impedes the fall of any neutron-bearing atom. The crowd of protons poses an atmospheric resistance for any other atoms, serving to winnow any other substance into the event horizon except for separate electrons with their stated immunity. The accretion disk thus conveys all other matter into the black hole, but hoards its protons until they can eventually nullify or overturn the negative galactic majority charge.
We seem to have blundered into seeing how black holes can grab stars that seem safely hidden far away in orbit. Meanwhile, about those electrons laid down onto the extended rotational axis of the accretion disk: they repel away along that axis under extreme control of a very large focusing anode whereby the resulting beam maintains equidistance from all around the mean effective electrostatic circle of the disk. The columns of electrons departing from a point short of the singularity might offer imperative escape paths for mounting temperatures of convergence, and momentary endothermic emergence of positrons could provide for timely explosive energy dispatch outside of the event horizon.
Version 2 Modified 6/6/09
We have alluded to the positive core of stellar bodies, and will get back to that in a later post. Letting it suffice to describe stellar fusion as an issue of positron depletion, we borrow credence that shining galaxies bear an excess of electrons. Hence, systemic traction for charged particles in shining stars and in outer portions of shining galaxies is outward for electrons and inward for particles of positive charge. There is no escape for such positive particles from an active galaxy. They descend to an ever-increasing accretion disk which has become an orbiting body of protons whirling around a super massive black hole that was nothing more than the center of gravity for the disk in the first place, or of the sphere that the disk had been at the time.
Beneath the rim of this accretion disk lies a domain of dark matter by virtue of regional positive majority charge: systemic traction strives to elevate particles of positive charge and to drive electrons down to the rotational axis. At any elevation within the disk, a proton holds its radial position in part from centrifugal force and in part from electrostatic repulsion. Protons at the rim of the disk are at electrostatic rest, held aloft from the black hole by its transverse velocity ergo centrifugal force. Protons gain displacement down from the rim as kinetic energy converts to virtual electrical charge under the influence of descending electrons sweeping across the orbital proton paths. Positive ionic density tapers down with descent due to increased electron density brought on by convergence.
As the accretion disk continues to grow, its rim intervenes upon any neutral matter such as to be found in stellar systems or dust in orbit around the singularity, to rip away electrons with its severe electrostatic traction. It thus showers the protons below with momentary neutralizations as perhaps they take an occasional encirclement. During such neutralization of a proton at any given level, it has lost its electrostatic share of lift, to fall a tiny way before re-ionization. Thereby, kinetic energy has given way to increased storage of electrical energy as the proton finds itself driven farther from its quest of the rim. Each such incident steps the proton to lower radial position on the disk and to a reduced velocity. Given the influence of a sufficient unrelenting wash of descending electrons, a proton could be driven as far down as the event horizon, or anywhere between. The overall result is a smearing of proton wind that confounds orbital suspension for heavier particles to be conveyed into the event horizon. When "feeding time" is over, the charged portion should thin down and stretch out as though a casted noose extending out in pursuit of more distant star systems. After roping another victim, a new supply of descending electrons spreads the disk out to filter more food into the black hole, and the galaxy gets reamed out some more.
No such rigmarole impedes the fall of any neutron-bearing atom. The crowd of protons poses an atmospheric resistance for any other atoms, serving to winnow any other substance into the event horizon except for separate electrons with their stated immunity. The accretion disk thus conveys all other matter into the black hole, but hoards its protons until they can eventually nullify or overturn the negative galactic majority charge.
We seem to have blundered into seeing how black holes can grab stars that seem safely hidden far away in orbit. Meanwhile, about those electrons laid down onto the extended rotational axis of the accretion disk: they repel away along that axis under extreme control of a very large focusing anode whereby the resulting beam maintains equidistance from all around the mean effective electrostatic circle of the disk. The columns of electrons departing from a point short of the singularity might offer imperative escape paths for mounting temperatures of convergence, and momentary endothermic emergence of positrons could provide for timely explosive energy dispatch outside of the event horizon.
Thursday, March 5, 2009
ELECTRICAL INFLUENCES UPON COSMIC ARCHITECTURE
The significance of repolarized matter (electrically reformatted from classic atomic format) is the predictable shape it assumes within material clusters. The spherical shape taken by gas clusters of low rotational velocity would result in hollow outer shells bearing particles of the majority electrical polarity, each centered within by a spherical formation of particles of the minority polarity. Where rotational velocity suffices to flatten a cluster into a disk, electrical particles of the majority polarity would favor the rim of such a disk and particles of the minority polarity would tend to extend as a filament along the rotational axis under the centering influence of the rim.
Predominately spherical clusters of hydrogen gas bearing negative charge would tend to form stellar candidates by exclusive virtue of holding fusible material at their central cores. A disk of such electrical charge would tend to develop polar jetting of positive core material aligned along its rotational axis and projected under influence of a focusing cathode formed at its rim.
Conversely, hydrogen clouds bearing positive charge would keep spherical forms in darkness by precluding fusion through their holding of negative cores; and as disks, would align electrons along their rotational axes to repel them as beams under influence of the rim acting as a focusing anode.
Monday, March 2, 2009
Another Force
Posted by Dale Miller
We have such oodles and oodles of data nowadays that surely many conclusions are due to us just from incidental appraisal of evidence already at hand. It does seem that we can now critique popular reports of cosmic acceleration, explain snowflake and lightning formation processes, describe the workings of polar jets, and deduce how super massive black holes snare stars that had been orbiting them. This posting attempts to break such ground with revelation of a forsaken force in cosmic architecture.
Contemplation of M. Faraday's ice pail suggests that charged particles can and do become rearranged for indefinite periods of time. We might describe such phenomena as electroconcentric repolarization. The effect represents a migration of particles that results in altered situations for the materials involved. Therein lies Another Force. A good local example of such material shifting might be the meteorologist's FWC (Fair Weather Current) whereby electrons travel up through the atmosphere to our electrosphere AKA ionosphere. Most electronics technicians should suppose this current to demonstrate that the earth has more negative particles than positive ones, and the consequential negative charge resides at the earth's outer limits in keeping with Faraday's demonstration.
It follows that positive charges travel or propagate downward to the center of our planet. Gravity must suffice to withhold those extra electrons from earthly departure. Given the electrostatic traction afforded such particles, it also follows that any ionizing event that reduces an ion's pull upon its displaced electron to less than the pull of global traction will yield that electron to the electrosphere. The added positive charge propagated to Earth's core provides the additional holding required for the added electron enlisted into the electrosphere, but we can know that neither transition represents a storage of energy because the excursions are taken exothermically. Despite the semantic hazard of the charged particles involved then, there is no energy invested by the rearrangement; hence there is no concern about imperfect insulation. Your informant remains unaware of any limit to the ratio of electrons thus retained electrically to those under gravitational restraint, nor of any limit to the size of a Faraday cage.
If no one shows us that repolarization doesn't happen, we will get back soon with some more of the story.
We have such oodles and oodles of data nowadays that surely many conclusions are due to us just from incidental appraisal of evidence already at hand. It does seem that we can now critique popular reports of cosmic acceleration, explain snowflake and lightning formation processes, describe the workings of polar jets, and deduce how super massive black holes snare stars that had been orbiting them. This posting attempts to break such ground with revelation of a forsaken force in cosmic architecture.
Contemplation of M. Faraday's ice pail suggests that charged particles can and do become rearranged for indefinite periods of time. We might describe such phenomena as electroconcentric repolarization. The effect represents a migration of particles that results in altered situations for the materials involved. Therein lies Another Force. A good local example of such material shifting might be the meteorologist's FWC (Fair Weather Current) whereby electrons travel up through the atmosphere to our electrosphere AKA ionosphere. Most electronics technicians should suppose this current to demonstrate that the earth has more negative particles than positive ones, and the consequential negative charge resides at the earth's outer limits in keeping with Faraday's demonstration.
It follows that positive charges travel or propagate downward to the center of our planet. Gravity must suffice to withhold those extra electrons from earthly departure. Given the electrostatic traction afforded such particles, it also follows that any ionizing event that reduces an ion's pull upon its displaced electron to less than the pull of global traction will yield that electron to the electrosphere. The added positive charge propagated to Earth's core provides the additional holding required for the added electron enlisted into the electrosphere, but we can know that neither transition represents a storage of energy because the excursions are taken exothermically. Despite the semantic hazard of the charged particles involved then, there is no energy invested by the rearrangement; hence there is no concern about imperfect insulation. Your informant remains unaware of any limit to the ratio of electrons thus retained electrically to those under gravitational restraint, nor of any limit to the size of a Faraday cage.
If no one shows us that repolarization doesn't happen, we will get back soon with some more of the story.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)